Wrong again. Physicists as well.
Yeah, so not mathematicians. So maybe can go try to sell this book on a forum for physicists. I predict limited success, but godspeed.
Maudlin's New Foundations for Physical Geometry: The Theory of Linear Structures
Has anyone here read Tim Maudlin's New Foundations for Physical Geometry: The Theory of Linear Structures?
Has Maudlin really devised a brand new geometry? What does it accomplish?
I believe he is a philosopher?
Indeed what are Maudlin’s physical principles, postulates, predictions, and equations?
Has anyone here read Tim Maudlin's New Foundations for Physical Geometry: The Theory of Linear Structures?
Has Maudlin really devised a brand new geometry? What does it accomplish?
I believe he is a philosopher?
Supposedly he’s coming out with a second book in the series which will make the first book make sense.
Supposedly the book has been delayed.
Wouldn’t be surprised if we never saw it.
Has anyone here read Tim Maudlin's New Foundations for Physical Geometry: The Theory of Linear Structures?
Has Maudlin really devised a brand new geometry? What does it accomplish?
I believe he is a philosopher?
Supposedly he’s coming out with a second book in the series which will make the first book make sense.
Supposedly the book has been delayed.
Wouldn’t be surprised if we never saw it.
We can only hope.
[...]
Supposedly he’s coming out with a second book in the series which will make the first book make sense.
Supposedly the book has been delayed.
Wouldn’t be surprised if we never saw it.
We can only hope.
Newton didn't come out with a second book to help Principia make physical sense, but then again, Newton was no Maudlin.
why are we mathematicians so narrow minded?
I think we're just asking the simple question:
What are Tim Maudlin's physical principles, postulates, predictions, and equations? Why should we have to wait for a second book, which may never come out, to find out?
Nothing narrow-minded about asking simple questions. Refusing to answer them is what is narrow-minded.
why are we mathematicians so narrow minded?
I think we're just asking the simple question:
What are Tim Maudlin's physical principles, postulates, predictions, and equations? Why should we have to wait for a second book, which may never come out, to find out?
Nothing narrow-minded about asking simple questions. Refusing to answer them is what is narrow-minded.
I don't believe that you are a mathematician.
[...]
I think we're just asking the simple question:
What are Tim Maudlin's physical principles, postulates, predictions, and equations? Why should we have to wait for a second book, which may never come out, to find out?
Nothing narrow-minded about asking simple questions. Refusing to answer them is what is narrow-minded.
I don't believe that you are a mathematician.
lol are you accusing me of being a philosopher?
Read the book. This is not a supervised reading group.
why are we mathematicians so narrow minded?
I think we're just asking the simple question:
What are Tim Maudlin's physical principles, postulates, predictions, and equations? Why should we have to wait for a second book, which may never come out, to find out?
Nothing narrow-minded about asking simple questions. Refusing to answer them is what is narrow-minded.
Read the book. This is not a supervised reading group.
[...]
I think we're just asking the simple question:
What are Tim Maudlin's physical principles, postulates, predictions, and equations? Why should we have to wait for a second book, which may never come out, to find out?
Nothing narrow-minded about asking simple questions. Refusing to answer them is what is narrow-minded.
What novel idea does the book propose that furthers quantum mechanics?
Your screen is so tiny that we decided to disable the captcha and posting feature
Formatting guidelines: Commonmark with no images and html allowed. $ and $$ for LaTeX. Input previewed in last post of thread. For a link to be allowed it must include the http(s) tag and come from the list of allowed domains.