# How did string theory get so far without any principles or equations?

1. Top Mathematician
vxfa

How did string theory get so far without any physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations?

2 weeksvxfa
Quote 6 Up 14 Down Report
2. Top Mathematician
ybpx

2 weeksybpx
Quote 10 Up 0 Down Report
3. Top Mathematician
mjpa

Maybe instead of asking the same retarded question every week, you should go learn quantum field theory and string theory and realize why your question is retarded.

2 weeksmjpa
Quote 17 Up 2 Down Report
4. Top Mathematician
ehuy

Maybe instead of asking the same retarded question every week, you should go learn quantum field theory and string theory and realize why your question is retarded.

Please just share the physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations of string theory. Unless they don’t exist.

2 weeksehuy
Quote 4 Up 11 Down Report
5. Top Mathematician
vskw

Gallows, or the pox? That depends on whether I embrace the principles, or ...

2 weeksvskw
Quote 1 Up 0 Down Report
6. Top Mathematician
rteb

Alexander why don't you tell us what you think string theory is. I'm always looking to learn from experts in their discipline!

2 weeksrteb
Quote 6 Up 0 Down Report
7. Top Mathematician
hypd

2 weekshypd
Quote 2 Up 0 Down Report
8. Top Mathematician
ehuy

Alexander why don't you tell us what you think string theory is. I'm always looking to learn from experts in their discipline!

Please just share the physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations of string theory. Unless they don’t exist.

2 weeksehuy
Quote 2 Up 4 Down Report
9. Top Mathematician
doxc

Alexander why don't you tell us what you think string theory is. I'm always looking to learn from experts in their discipline!

Please just share the physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations of string theory. Unless they don’t exist.

You should really just kill yourself if you can't figure out how to read a book.

2 weeksdoxc
Quote 7 Up 1 Down Report
10. Top Mathematician
jvhp
[...]

Please just share the physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations of string theory. Unless they don’t exist.

You should really just kill yourself if you can't figure out how to read a book.

I read all of Brian Greene’s and Michio Kaku’s books. String Theory has no physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations. Read the books and you’ll see.

2 weeksjvhp
Quote 5 Up 9 Down Report
11. Top Mathematician
dyhm

Seems like a reasonable question. I also am curious what the answer is. I don’t have time to learn a new field, I have an active research program.

The responses have loser incel energy.

2 weeksdyhm
Quote 3 Up 7 Down Report
12. Top Mathematician
ptqg

Seems like a reasonable question. I also am curious what the answer is. I don’t have time to learn a new field, I have an active research program.

The responses have loser incel energy.

Lol it really does appear that String Theory has no physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations.

Otherwise someone would share them.

For instance, Newton had equations like F=ma. Einstein had equations like E=mc^2.

String Theory is different lol.

2 weeksptqg
Quote 4 Up 6 Down Report
13. Top Mathematician
arpe
[...]

You should really just kill yourself if you can't figure out how to read a book.

I read all of Brian Greene’s and Michio Kaku’s books. String Theory has no physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations. Read the books and you’ll see.

Greene's is a popular book. If you read Kaku's technical books then I would understand your claim but I assume you read his popular books as well...

2 weeksarpe
Quote 2 Up 0 Down Report
14. Top Mathematician
nylo

Mirror Symmetry came from String Theory right?

2 weeksnylo
Quote 1 Up 1 Down Report
15. Top Mathematician
ptqg
[...]

I read all of Brian Greene’s and Michio Kaku’s books. String Theory has no physical principles, postulates, predictions, or equations. Read the books and you’ll see.

Greene's is a popular book. If you read Kaku's technical books then I would understand your claim but I assume you read his popular books as well...

Newton's Principia is a popular book. It has equations. Euclid's Elements is a popular book It has principles, postulates, and equations.

Green's Elegant Universe book on String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations because String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations.

2 weeksptqg
Quote 3 Up 5 Down Report
16. Top Mathematician
arpe
[...]

Greene's is a popular book. If you read Kaku's technical books then I would understand your claim but I assume you read his popular books as well...

Newton's Principia is a popular book. It has equations. Euclid's Elements is a popular book It has principles, postulates, and equations.

Green's Elegant Universe book on String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations because String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations.

Do you understand the difference between a pop science book addressed to layman and a technical book? You are just thick as a brick.

2 weeksarpe
Quote 7 Up 1 Down Report
17. Top Mathematician
lrjy
[...]

Newton's Principia is a popular book. It has equations. Euclid's Elements is a popular book It has principles, postulates, and equations.

Green's Elegant Universe book on String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations because String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations.

Do you understand the difference between a pop science book addressed to layman and a technical book? You are just thick as a brick.

This guy is obviously mentally ill, he needs help.

2 weekslrjy
Quote 3 Up 0 Down Report
18. Top Mathematician
ptqg
[...]

Newton's Principia is a popular book. It has equations. Euclid's Elements is a popular book It has principles, postulates, and equations.

Green's Elegant Universe book on String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations because String Theory has no principles, postulates, nor equations.

Do you understand the difference between a pop science book addressed to layman and a technical book? You are just thick as a brick.

Was Einstein's THE MEANING OF RELATIVITY a pop science book addressed to laymen, or was it a technical book? Was Newton's Principia a pop science book addressed to laymen, or was it a technical book? Was Euclid's Elements a pop science book addressed to laymen, or was it a technical book?

2 weeksptqg
Quote 6 Up 2 Down Report
19. Top Mathematician
ptqg

Love all the insults coming from the string theory fanboyz.

String Theory fanboyz have no principles, postulates, nor equations.

They have only insults, like their failed elders.

2 weeksptqg
Quote 4 Up 3 Down Report
20. Top Mathematician
xhjf

Postulate: Lagrangian submanifolds in symplectic geometry have physical meaning.

2 weeksxhjf
Quote 0 Up 4 Down Report
Your screen is so tiny that we decided to disable the captcha and posting feature
Store settings & IDs (locally, encrypted)
Formatting guidelines: Commonmark with no images and html allowed. $and$\$ for LaTeX. Input previewed in last post of thread. For a link to be allowed it must include the http(s) tag and come from the list of allowed domains.